Ballot Recommendations November 3, 2026
October 15, 2026







I am flattered that a few people have asked me for my voting recommendations on the November 3, 2026, ballot. So here goes:

 

Richmond

Item

Recommendation

Discussion

Mayor

Ahmad Anderson

It is time to take back City from the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA). Anderson is endorsed by almost all the local, state and federal Democratic elected officials – with whom he will need to collaborate to move Richmond in the right
direction.

 

Anderson’s opponent, Claudia Jimemez is bad for Richmond. Her principle endorsers, supporters and funding sources are City of Richmond public employee unions, to whom she has been very generous. Like other RPA City Council members, she
is anti-police, anti-business, and anti-housing. The RPA has killed thousands of units of housing in Richmond over the last four years, including affordable housing, and discouraged businesses from locating in Richmond. Jimenez has led the effort to gut the
police force while Richmond’s crime rate remains over 30% higher than the national average, and nearly 40% higher than the California average.

 

Aside from political failings, you have to consider whether Jimenez’ demeanor is mayoral. She is ill-prepared for City Council meetings, doesn’t understand what is going on, is rude to, interrupts, and harangues other City Council members
endlessly, and she can’t stop talking. – usually nonsense.

Measure Q

No

While it is true that Richmond needs to upgrade or replace some fire stations, there is no
current detailed condition study that shows exactly what needs to be done, what the priorities are, and the associated cost. For example, the report to the City Council includes millions of dollars for a new fire training facility, but Richmond is currently
 a partner in a proposed East Bay regional facility that is already being funded by government grants. There may be a lot of waste in this measure. The firefighters and the RPA have become tight in the last four years, which makes me both suspicious and skeptical.

 

National Offices

 

United States Representative

John Garamendi

 

 

State Offices

 

State Assembly District 14

Buffy Wicks

 

 

Community College District

 

Board Member Ward 1

Raquel Donoso

 

 

Regional Measures

 

Regional Transit Measure RTM

Yes

The Bay Area is still grappling with the fallout of COVID that affected public transit ridership, but that will change. Vehicle congestion at bridges has already surpassed pre-COVID levels, which is not sustainable. We need a robust public
transportation system to support healthy economy.

 

West Contra Costa Unified School District

 

Measure V

Yes

Almost everyone is unhappy with the West Contra Costa Unified School District for one reason or another, but bleeding it dry is not the answer. This is not a new tax; it renews existing vital education funding.

 

State Propositions

 

Propositions are always troubling because, unless they are the result of a legislative vote (and sometimes even then), they are typically sponsored by special interests and big money, almost always with hidden agendas.

 

Proposition 1 – Housing Affordability

Yes

 

Proposition 2 – Rainy Day Fund

Yes

 

Proposition 3 – Extending Existing tax on High Incomes

Yes

 

Proposition 4 – Public Funding of Election Campaigns

Yes

 

Proposition 5 – Recall Elections

Yes

 

Proposition 37 – Loan Program for New Homes

Yes

 

Proposition 38 – Bonds for Immunology Research

Yes

 

Proposition 39 – Government Issued ID

No

 

Proposition 40 – Billionaire Tax

Yes

This is a tough one. We need to tax the richest more, but this one has some questionable advocates, including Bernie Sanders, SEIU, CNA and AFT. On the other hand, the funding is directed to healthcare and education and is badly needed.
Separate chapters of Planned Parenthood apparently both support and oppose the measure! Opponents argue it will actually reduce funding by driving billionaires out of state. I’m going to hold my nose and vote for it.

Proposition 41 – Prohibits new state taxes

No

Cancels out Proposition 40

Proposition 42 – Prohibits new state taxes

No

Cancels out Proposition 40

Proposition 43 – Limits Local Government

Revenue

No

 

Proposition 44 – Community Health Clinic Spending Restrictions

No

Funded by one special interest group seeking political leverage over health clinics.

Proposition 45 – Limits Environmental Review

No

 

 

Statewide Offices

 

Lieutenant Governor

Fiona Ma

 

Secretary of State

Shirley Weber

 

Controller

Malia Cohen

 

Treasurer

Eleni Kounalakis

 

Attorney General

Rob Bonta

 

Insurance Commissioner

Ben Allen

 

Board of Equalization District 2

John Pimentel

 

Superintendent of Public Instruction

Richard Barrera

 

 

 

 

Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM delivered to your email address?

Click here to sign-up to receive the E-Forum
. Tom Butt is the former mayor of Richmond, CA, having served 27+ years until January of 2023, eight of those as elected mayor. Tom Butt is an architect and founder of the 50-year
old Richmond architecture-engineering firm Interactive Resources. He serves on the board of two Richmond nonprofits,
Rosie the Riveter Trust and
East Brother Light Station, Inc. Visit the
Tom
Butt website
for additional information about Tom Butt’s activities and a digest of past E-FORUMS going back to 2000,
http://www.tombutt.com. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by selecting “unsubscribe from
this list” at the bottom of this email. This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

This email was sent to *|EMAIL|*

why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*


Recent Posts