The United Heckathorn Superfund site has been an EPA failure for years. The sticking point has been that EPA is reluctant to spend more funds on cleanups than they can recover
from past owners. To add insult to injury, funds derived from the United Heckathorn contamination were diverted to a project in another county.
In 2012, I wrote:
Just a failure to address the DDT pollution levels that now exceed pre-cleanup contamination is bad enough, but it has now come to light that the same triumvirate of
public agencies that has diverted environmental cleanup funds from Richmond for years successfully conspired in the 1990s to divert to Sonoma County funds secured from the Lauritzen Channel polluters instead of using these funds in Richmond. (https://tombutt.com/do-not-eat-any-fish-caught-here-epa-to-brief-city-council-on-united-heckathorn-fiasco-at-january-24-city-council-meeting/)
I participated in multiple meetings with the EPA over the years regarding United Heckthorn, the last of which were in the first Trump Administration and predictably came to nothing.
Getting funding to actually clean the site will be challenging in the second Trump administration.
Article from
Richmondside below:
30 years later, EPA is planning second cleanup of Richmond Superfund site
EPA said removing DDT and other chemicals from the Heckathorn site in Richmond Harbor was complicated, so a second cleanup is needed.
by Karina
IoffeeApril 25, 2025, 6:55 a.m.
After cleaning up chemicals from Richmond Harbor in the 1990s, the EPA did more testing in 2012 (pictured) and found
there were still dangerous levels of DDT and other pesticides. It’s now planning a second cleanup. Credit: Associated Press
From 1944 to 1966, chemical companies formulated, packaged, and shipped pesticides, including dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dieldrin, in the Lauritzen,
Parr and Santa Fe channels of the Richmond Harbor. This left behind a stew of contamination, part of the toxic legacy facing many Richmond neighborhoods.
The amount of chemicals in the harbor, especially Lauritzen Channel, is so high that the site, United Heckathorn — named after one of the chemical companies — was
declared a Superfund in 1990, meaning it receives money from the Environmental Protection Agency to be cleaned up. But despite soil dredging in the 1990s, the chemicals remain in
the water and fish, which aren’t safe for humans to eat.
On Wednesday, the EPA held a virtual community meeting to explain the site’s history, cleanup efforts to date and to take questions from concerned residents. It was
the first of six planned meetings pushed for by local groups to create engagement and transparency as the federal agency plans additional cleanup at the site.
“This is a matter of creating trust, communication and getting an awful lot of questions answered,” said Janet Johnson, a member of the Richmond
Shoreline Alliance, which advocates for cleaning up the city’s waterfront. “We’re a frontline community that has always been the last on the list in terms of cleanups.”
Richmond has more than 100 hazardous waste sites and two Superfund sites, In addition to United Heckathorn, there’s the Liquid
Gold Oil Corp. Superfund site, a former oil recycling operation at Hoffman Boulevard and South 47th Street. (The EPA is currently reviewing
its cleanup of the Liquid Gold site, with a report due in September.)
The EPA’s United Heckathorn Superfund site is named after a chemical company that processed pesticides in Richmond in
the late 1940s through the mid-1960s. Credit: Environmental Protection Agency
Cleanup efforts in the harbor took place in 1990 when the EPA dredged and removed an estimated 3,300 cubic yards of contaminated soil at United Heckathorn. It also
put in a five-acre reinforced concrete cap on contaminated soil further up from the shoreline. Since then, cleanup of the Parr Channel was determined to have been effective. But samples collected in 2013 and 2016 in the Lauritzen Channel showed concentrations
of DDT and dieldrin up to 3,800 times higher than acceptable levels. The contamination was found in sediment, water, mussels and fish, prompting a “Do Not Eat” advisory that still remains in effect.
A 2021 EPA report found that the cleanup has not been “protective of
human health” and that a new remedial action will need to be implemented to ensure “protectiveness.” Yet despite these findings, no additional cleanup has been done since the 1990s.
“For many years, no one could get the state or the EPA to pay attention,” said Richmond City Council member Sue Wilson, whose district is located next to the Richmond
Harbor. “As a result, people became amateur scientists and started monitoring and tracking levels of contamination. There is an incredible amount of scientific knowledge held by community groups who now have an opportunity to give their input.”
Download the EPA’s Wednesday presentation below
Scientists working at the Richmond, CA., Heckathorn Superfund site in 2012. Credit: Associated Press
Today Lauritzen Channel houses the Levin-Richmond Terminal Corporation, a bulk marine terminal that ships petroleum coke and coal to Japan, Korea and Mexico. That
will be phased out by the end of next year, following a settlement between the company and the city of Richmond.
Karen Jurist, an EPA project manager, called United Heckathorn a technically complex site, in part because it’s in an active shipping channel. During work in the
‘90s, cleanup crews were impeded by abandoned pilings, sediment under an old pier and dredge buckets that didn’t have enough teeth to dig into old bay mud, which is more compacted. In addition, discharge from storm drains, groundwater seepage, previously unaddressed
shoreline embankments and wood chips from pilings laced with DDT and dieldrin have all contributed to the ongoing high levels of contamination.
Asked why it has taken so long to do additional clean up, Jurist said that the EPA needed to consult with additional experts and do technical reviews before presenting
a new solution.
“We want to clean up the site in the most effective way to protect human health and the environment,” she said.
A diver collects mussels in 2012 from the Richmond Harbor to test their chemical contamination levels. The EPA found
water and wildlife had more than 3,800 times the acceptable limit, making it dangerous to eat anything caught there. Credit: Associated Press
One of the chief concerns for attendees of Wednesday’s meeting is the impact of sea level rise on contaminants. Jurist said that the EPA has considered that and in
2023 completed a climate vulnerability assessment that evaluated how adaptable various treatment technologies are to the impacts of climate change. This included evaluating the capacity of the stormwater system, post storm inspections to make sure the concrete
cap covering soil contamination is in place and designing embankments that “consider future sea level rise.”
After completing the new round of meetings, by the end of 2025 the EPA plans to present a feasibility study that includes a proposed cleanup plan. There will then
be a public comment period, meaning that work would not start until 2027 at the earliest.
The next community meeting has been scheduled for May 21 and will likely be virtual, although some in-person meetings will also be held. Meetings are also scheduled
for June 26 and July 29. Visit the website for further details.
Read more about the project history, including maps and EPA reports.
Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM delivered to your email address?
Click here to sign-up to receive the E-Forum. Tom Butt is the former mayor of Richmond, CA, having served 27+ years until January of 2023, eight of those as elected mayor. Tom Butt is an architect and founder of the 50-year
old Richmond architecture-engineering firm Interactive Resources. He serves on the board of two Richmond nonprofits,
Rosie the Riveter Trust and
East Brother Light Station, Inc. Visit the
Tom
Butt website for additional information about Tom Butt’s activities and a digest of past E-FORUMS going back to 2000,
http://www.tombutt.com. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by selecting “unsubscribe from
this list” at the bottom of this email. This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|