San Francisco Weighs Joining Richmond to Help ‘Underwater’ Homeowners
Isabel Angell | July 10, 2014

Richmond is attempting to use eminent domain to help ‘underwater’ mortgage holders. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors say they want the city to join Richmond in a controversial effort to help homeowners facing foreclosure. In a program facing legal threats and stalled by a City Council minority, Richmond wants to use its power of eminent domain to seize “underwater” homes” — properties for which mortgage holders owe more than the homes are currently worth.
San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos says he’s working with the city attorney’s office to draft legislation to create a joint powers authority with Richmond that could help deflect lawsuit threats and allow the program to go ahead. At the Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, Avalos postponed a vote on a resolution commending Richmond for its eminent domain program and declaring San Francisco’s intention to sign on to a joint powers authority. Cosponsors include Supervisors David Campos, Jane Kim and Eric Mar.
Under Richmond’s plan, the city would work with an outside investment firm to take over as many as 600 underwater properties or buy them at current market value, then grant new, affordable mortgages. The banking and real-estate industries and federal home loan authorities oppose the plan. Supporters of the plan on the Richmond City Council, which voted to set up the program last year, have been unable to get the supermajority of members they’d need to actually go ahead with seizing properties. The main worry expressed by opponents: the city’s possible liability if it’s sued.
But the program might proceed if other cities sign on to the plan — especially one with the financial clout of San Francisco.
“San Francisco joining that effort, especially when we are a center of financial institutions, would send a strong message that creating these tools to protect households against defaults and foreclosures is essential,” Avalos said Wednesday.
Avalos said the program would also help people San Francisco residents. He hopes to introduce the legislation to the board by the end of the month.
“This will be an enormous boon for a lot of working-class communities of color,” he said. “We have a huge out-migration of African-Americans in San Francisco, and many African-American households see this as a real strong tool that will enable them to stay in the city.”
Richmond City Councilman Tom Butt has supported the eminent domain plan from the beginning — he calls it a creative and brilliant solution to the city’s housing problems. But he says he’s not expecting San Francisco or any other city to join Richmond soon.
“We’ve been two weeks away from having a partner for the last nine months,” he said. “So every time some city takes an interest in this, I sort of take it with a grain of salt. It’d be great if it happened but it would also, I think, surprise me.”
Butt said even if another city signs on immediately, unresolved legal issues mean it could take years before eminent domain could bail out a single household.

Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM and other action alerts on Richmond political and community issues delivered to your email address? Email your name and email address and/or the names and email addresses of others who would like to be placed on the mailing list and the message "subscribe" to tom.butt@intres.com. Comments, arguments and corrections are welcome.  Tom Butt is a member of the Richmond City Council   when opinions and views expressed, without other attribution, in TOM BUTT E-FORUM, they are those of Tom Butt and do not reflect official views or positions of the City of Richmond or the Richmond City Council unless otherwise noted. Visit the Tom Butt website for additional information about Tom Butt's activities on the Richmond City Council: http://www.tombutt.com.  Phone 510/236-7435 or 510/237-2084. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by responding with “unsubscribe.” It may take a few days to remove addresses from the distribution list.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

To the extent that content is excerpted under the fair use doctrine from other media, I urge readers to subscribe to the print versions of these media with print versions to help support professional journalism and the businesses that publish news, and I urge readers to log in to the online versions to access additional content, related content and unrelated news as well as the advertisements that support the media. I especially appreciate local sources of news that include the Contra Costa Times , the San Francisco Chronicle, Richmond Confidential and the East Bay Express.