]
Tom Butt Header E-Forum
 
  E-Mail Forum – 2014  
  < RETURN  
  Men and Women of Valor Supporters on the City Council Delay
July 3, 2014
 
 

On July 1, 2014, the City Council failed to get a supermajority vote (required to extend meetings past 11:30 PM) to end debate and vote on funding allocations for the North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan. The item had been held over from a previous meeting because time had also previously run out before a vote could be taken. Bates, Booze and Rogers did not support the motion, and the meeting ended shortly after 11:30 PM.

Reporter Robert Rogers Tweeted:

Council meeting ends on sour note as Jim Rogers votes no on passing North Richmond mitigation funding plan, which excluded Men and Women of Valor. Jovanka Beckles was outraged. "So one group doesn't get their money so no one gets their money, good job Jim!" she said.

The sticking point was a protest from an organization, Men and Women of Valor, who were unhappy about not being funded for a project they had proposed under the North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan.

Jovanka Beckles further commented:

"... Tonight, was so pathetic. Crabs in a barrel. One group didn't get funded, so they were happy no one got funded. Which means, People in North Richmond will not get the services they need. That saddened and angered me."

The North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan specifies the proposed activities and projected revenue derived from the collection of Mitigation Fees for the Bulk Material Processing Center (BMPC) in calendar years 2013 and 2014, as recommended by the North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Committee, for approval by the Richmond City Council and Contra Costa Board of Supervisors.

Staff review of the Men and Women of Valor proposal indicated that, “In past, applicant had issues with a past fiscal sponsor. However, recommend working close with City and County to insure no issues in future, if given funding,” and “Did not follow application template, sections missing. High admin costs shown in budget…” See http://www.cccounty.us/DocumentCenter/View/31024.

According to Guidestar, “This organization's [Men and Women of Valor] exempt status was automatically revoked by the IRS for failure to file a Form 990, 990-EZ, 990-N, or 990-PF for 3 consecutive years. Further investigation and due diligence are warranted.”

The problem is that the deadlock delays and may preclude the expenditure of hundreds of thousands of dollars targeted to reduce blight. Supervisor John Gioia wrote:

None of the North Richmond Mitigation funding can be spent until both the City Council and the Board of Supervisors approve a one year spending plan. The Board of Supervisors has already approved the spending plan based on the fact that the plan was unanimously approved by the North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee which is comprised of several Richmond City Council members, a representative of my office, and several residents of North Richmond (including from the NR Municipal Advisory Council). Some of the money goes to support City and County services in North Richmond and some goes to community non-profits providing services in North Richmond. Also, if the City and County do not agree on a joint spending plan for how the money can benefit all of North Richmond (both city and county areas), the City and County could then each decide how to spend their half of the money and not go thru a joint process. In either case, the money must be spent in North Richmond.

The bigger issue here is that the council has not yet acted on this North Richmond expenditure plan during the 2 meetings its been on their agenda (last week and this week) The plan entails spending about $700,000 in funding over the 2014/15 fiscal year in North Richmond for such things as neighborhood cleanups, additional code enforcement, extra law enforcement, extra trash pickups from public streets, community garden projects, and various community based projects. A committee of 3 City Councilmembers, 3 North Richmond residents, and a representative of my office make up the Mitigation Fee Committee, which develops the expenditure plan. The Committee unanimously approved the plan and it was approved in June by the Board of Supervisors. None of the money can be spent until the plan is approved by both the City and the County. One of the non-profits (Men and Women of Valor) which did not get funded (it was seeking $20,000) has objected to the plan. That is the reason it has not yet been approved. In the meantime, the other important expenditures cannot go forward until the Richmond approves the plan. I'm hopeful that a plan will be approved at their July 15 meeting. We are into the new fiscal year, and the funding is being held up until a plan is approved.

It is unclear whether Bates and Booze hope to redirect funding to Men and Women of Valor or to simply stall the process, resulting in no funds being jointly distributed.

Bates and Booze have long been associated with the Men and Women of Valor, but Roger’s association is murkier. Rogers has been a long-time supporter of a project called “Greenprint,” for which he obtained a multi-million dollar grant from Chevron as a part of the Community Benefits Agreement with Chevron during the 2008 permitting of the ill-fated Chevron Modernization Project. Greenprint morphed into a program called “Easy Go

In 2011, The City of Richmond established the Greenprint Transportation Project, a citywide initiative geared towards reducing Richmond’s part in greenhouse gas emissions and VMT by offering mobility alternatives and transportation education. In an effort to educate and engage members of the Richmond community, the City partnered with service providers TransMETRO, Inc. and Getaround introducing "Easy Go Transportation Services." Housed at the Richmond Village Apartments, Easy Go is committed to providing safe and sustainable transportation services. Easy Go assist children to commute to school without the concern of danger, giving low-income parents the chance to travel without while enabling employees to commute to work at a low cost.

Easy Go is partially funded by the Chevron grant and partially funded by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. At the January 24, 2013, meeting of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, a total of 13 people associated  with Men and Women of Valor, as well as City staffer Lori Reese Brown, who always seems to routinely show up to support Men and Women of Valor, testified against a staff proposed reduction in funding for Shuttle Richmond Circular + Marina Bay project.

Dwight Adams, is frequently associated with men and Women of Valor. Mr. Adams appears below in a group photo of a cleanup project and is frequently associated with Men and Women of Valor. The Minutes of the May 22, 2012, City Council meeting reflect:

Dwight Adams thanked Councilmembers Bates and Boozé for assisting members of the Men and Women of Valor in obtaining jobs and challenged Councilmember Beckles to also help Richmond residents get jobs.

 

Council meeting
Richmond Post, August 8-14, 2012, showing Dwight Adams and Lori Reese-Brown

Dwight Adams is the individual who conspired with Corky Booze to run a hit piece against me just before the November 2012 election. See http://www.tombutt.com/forum/2013/130712.htm and  http://www.tombutt.com/forum/2013/130822.htm. Adams was the designated chair of Richmond One Committee, which settled a complaint by the City of Richmond for campaign violations by correcting campaign reports and paying a $2,000 fine.

Members and associates of Men and Women of Valor have long been a leading part of disruptions of Richmond City Council meetings, including routine expressions of homophobia and xenophobia. They have particularly singled out Jovanka Beckles for race-based and homophobic-based personal attacks that are way outside of the subject matter allowed under City Council rules consistent with the Brown Act and upheld by the courts. See http://www.tombutt.com/forum/2013/130725b.htm and http://www.tombutt.com/forum/2013/130730.htm.

Because they have never filed tax returns, no one knows where the funds come from that support Men and Women of Valor, and no one knows where any of that funding goes. In short, Men and Women of Valor enjoy little sympathy from members of the City Council except for Bates and Booze, both of whom support and encourage them.

Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM and other action alerts on Richmond political and community issues delivered to your email address? Email your name and email address and/or the names and email addresses of others who would like to be placed on the mailing list and the message "subscribe" to tom.butt@intres.com. Comments, arguments and corrections are welcome.  Tom Butt is a member of the Richmond City Council   when opinions and views expressed, without other attribution, in TOM BUTT E-FORUM, they are those of Tom Butt and do not reflect official views or positions of the City of Richmond or the Richmond City Council unless otherwise noted. Visit the Tom Butt website for additional information about Tom Butt's activities on the Richmond City Council: http://www.tombutt.com.  Phone 510/236-7435 or 510/237-2084. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by responding with “unsubscribe.” It may take a few days to remove addresses from the distribution list.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

To the extent that content is excerpted under the fair use doctrine from other media, I urge readers to subscribe to the print versions of these media with print versions to help support professional journalism and the businesses that publish news, and I urge readers to log in to the online versions to access additional content, related content and unrelated news as well as the advertisements that support the media. I especially appreciate local sources of news that include the Contra Costa Times , the San Francisco Chronicle, Richmond Confidential and the East Bay Express.

 

 
  < RETURN