]
Tom Butt Header E-Forum
 
  E-Mail Forum – 2014  
  < RETURN  
  Attorney General Slams Chevron Modernization EIR
June 10, 2014
 
 

Although apparently a letter from the California Attorney General critical of the Chevron Modernization EIR arrived at the City Friday night, no one bothered to tell the City Council about it. I found out from a Chevron spokesperson Monday afternoon, and I found a copy of the letter in an email from the RPA a little later. See the AG letter here.

I talked to a representative from the City’s EIR and legal team last night who told me that they felt blindsided by the AG. They had been working closely with the AG’s office for a long time in an effort to resolve any concerns and believed that resolution had been successful. They also believe that most, if not all, of the AG’s concerns have been resolved in revisions to the DEIR that are included in the FEIR.
The Final EIR was released on June 9, 2014. To view the Final EIR, please click here to go to the “Project Documents” page. 
I’m not so sure. I have read the letter and skimmed the FEIR. There appear to be some significant differences of opinion between our EIR team and the AG regarding legal requirements of what must be covered in an EIR.

We charged our EIR and legal team with producing a “bulletproof” EIR, and I thought we were there. Obviously not.

The AG identified five areas that it believes require further evaluation and possibly mitigation:

  1. Safety hazards of the proposed project;
  2. Potential project impacts on statewide climate protection objectives;
  3. The project's cumulative air pollution impacts on the already-disparately impacted local community;
  4. Feasible measures to cut local air pollution; and
  5. Reasonable alternatives that may be environmentally superior to the project as currently proposed.  

I’m not sure where we go from here, but this is a major development that may thwart my objective to get the FEIR certified and a permit issued before we go on August break. At this point, I would say we would be doing well to get it done before the end of 2014, and then it will likely become the target of a CEQA lawsuit like the last one.
IF the AG doesn’t challenge the EIR, they have provided the roadmap for others to do so.

Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM and other action alerts on Richmond political and community issues delivered to your email address? Email your name and email address and/or the names and email addresses of others who would like to be placed on the mailing list and the message "subscribe" to tom.butt@intres.com. Comments, arguments and corrections are welcome.  Tom Butt is a member of the Richmond City Council   when opinions and views expressed, without other attribution, in TOM BUTT E-FORUM, they are those of Tom Butt and do not reflect official views or positions of the City of Richmond or the Richmond City Council unless otherwise noted. Visit the Tom Butt website for additional information about Tom Butt's activities on the Richmond City Council: http://www.tombutt.com.  Phone 510/236-7435 or 510/237-2084. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by responding with “unsubscribe.” It may take a few days to remove addresses from the distribution list.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

To the extent that content is excerpted under the fair use doctrine from other media, I urge readers to subscribe to the print versions of these media with print versions to help support professional journalism and the businesses that publish news, and I urge readers to log in to the online versions to access additional content, related content and unrelated news as well as the advertisements that support the media. I especially appreciate local sources of news that include the Contra Costa Times , the San Francisco Chronicle, Richmond Confidential and the East Bay Express.


 

 
  < RETURN