Tom Butt Header E-Forum
  E-Mail Forum – 2013  
  < RETURN  
  Richmond Council Rejects Luxury Hillside Housing Plan
February 21, 2013

Richmond council rejects luxury hillside housing plan
By Robert Rogers Contra Costa Times
Posted:   02/19/2013 10:23:45 PM PST
Updated:   02/20/2013 12:39:52 PM PST

RICHMOND -- A proposed hillside development of three luxury houses was unanimously rejected by the City Council on Tuesday.
The applicant, William R. Randolph III, appealed an earlier decision by the city's Planning Commission denying his project in the El Sobrante Valley area because of concerns about unstable soil, water runoff and inadequate roadways. The city's Planning Department supported the plan, saying the development would include provisions to improve conditions for existing homes by shoring up surrounding infrastructure.
But the council was unmoved.
"This is a disaster waiting to happen," Councilman Nat Bates said.
The decision followed more than 90 minutes of debate, including reports by the city's planning staff and consultants as well as residents in the community surrounding Knobcone Court who opposed the application.
Planning Director Richard Mitchell acknowledged that roads and water drainage were a problem around the site but that they were not good reasons to reject further development.
"All these issues will be addressed," Mitchell said. "They actually would be better off with some development."
Tuesday's decision appears to put an end to a decade-long effort to further develop the hillside.
The plan, far smaller than early proposals in 2004, was to divide 2.85 acres into four parcels -- three large houses and a detention basin for storm runoff. No square-foot sizes for the houses were proposed Tuesday, but the lots would have been 13,000 to 16,000 square feet.
Residents said they already deal with deteriorating, narrow roads and storm runoff improperly channeled into their homes. They said the proposed development lacked specifics about how further impacts and slide dangers would be addressed, and lacked concrete assurances that issues such as water pressure and sewer drainage would not be impaired.
"There are too many problems left unsolved" by the plan, said Eleanor Loynd, co-chair of the El Sobrante Valley Zoning and Advisory Committee, a neighborhood group. "Too many ideas and plans that could go wrong."
Randolph appealed in vain to the council, noting that the proposal had been scaled back to assuage concerns and saying it would have more benefits than negatives. But Randolph seemed to see early on that he had no support on the council.
"This has been a long, arduous process," he said.
Contact Robert Rogers at 510-262-2726 or rrogers@bayareanewsgroup.com and follow Twitter.com/roberthrogers.

Want to receive TOM BUTT E-FORUM and other action alerts on Richmond political and community issues delivered to your email address? Email your name and email address and/or the names and email addresses of others who would like to be placed on the mailing list and the message "subscribe" to tom.butt@intres.com. Comments, arguments and corrections are welcome.  Tom Butt is a member of the Richmond City Council   when opinions and views expressed, without other attribution, in TOM BUTT E-FORUM, they are those of Tom Butt and do not reflect official views or positions of the City of Richmond or the Richmond City Council unless otherwise noted. Visit the Tom Butt website for additional information about Tom Butt's activities on the Richmond City Council: http://www.tombutt.com.  Phone 510/236-7435 or 510/237-2084. Subscription to this service is at the personal discretion of the recipient and may be terminated by responding with “unsubscribe.” It may take a few days to remove addresses from the distribution list.

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

To the extent that content is excerpted under the fair use doctrine from other media, I urge readers to subscribe to the print versions of these media to help support professional journalism and the businesses that publish news, and I urge readers to log in to the online versions to access additional content, related content and unrelated news. I especially appreciate local sources of news that include the Contra Costa Times , the San Francisco Chronicle, Richmond Confidential and the East Bay Express.