-
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
-
|
| E-Mail Forum |
| RETURN |
| Contra Costa Supes Vote to Support Richmond
Casino November 12, 2009 |
|
Nov 11, 2009 8:48 pm US/Pacific Contra Costa Supes Vote To Support Richmond CasinoRICHMOND (BCN) ―
Related Stories
After years of trying to prevent Indian gaming in
Contra Costa County, county supervisors unanimously voted Tuesday to
support a plan to bring a Las Vegas-style casino and resort to the
Richmond waterfront. (© CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Bay City News contributed to this report.) Contra Costa Supes Approve Vegas-Style Indian CasinoPosted: 5:10 pm PST November 11, 2009 RICHMOND, Calif. -- After years of trying to prevent Indian gaming in Contra Costa County, county supervisors unanimously voted Tuesday to support a plan to bring a Las Vegas-style casino and resort to the Richmond waterfront.
The project, proposed by the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians and the developer Upstream Point Molate LLC, includes a 124,000-square-foot class III casino; two hotels; luxury cottages; business, conference and entertainment facilities; a 300,000-square-foot shopping center and tribal government buildings on the 266-acre former Naval Fuel Depot Point Molate just north of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.
The proposed project also includes 340 units of multi-family housing, restoration of 34 historic buildings, a ferryboat terminal, shoreline parks, a tribal park and bicycle and pedestrian paths. Now that the county's agreement is in place, if the project is approved, the county will receive $12 million a year in additional revenue.
The county has estimated that about $6 million to
$7 million of that money would be used to pay for increased
law enforcement
Gioia, who represents west county, said that the county has spent nearly $1 million over the past several years opposing Indian gaming in the county, but felt that the dangers of continuing to oppose the Point Molate project were too great. The U.S. Navy has already transferred the land to the city of Richmond and, in 2004, the city entered into an agreement with the tribe and the developer to sell them the land to build the casino resort, Gioia said. It is now up to the U.S.
Department of the Interior
If that happens, the tribe would be able to open a class II casino, like the casino in San Pablo, without any additional negotiation with the county. Class II casinos include games such as bingo and card games in which players play against each other, not the house.
If the tribe wanted to open a class III casino, like the casinos in Las Vegas that offer slot machines, blackjack, craps and roulette, it would have to enter into a tribal-state compact with the governor that could include giving money to the county for mitigation of off-reservation impacts.
However, Gioia said that supervisors believe that the $12 million they negotiated is significantly more than they would get if they continued to oppose the project and then tried to negotiate later through arbitration.
Gioia also noted that the actual impacts of the project are difficult to predict. There will likely be increased crime, mainly robberies and burglaries, but there will also be many more jobs, which tends to decrease crime.
If approved, the project will bring 4,500 new, well-paying jobs to the area. The tribe has promised to hire Richmond residents to fill 40 percent of those positions and people who live elsewhere in Contra Costa County to fill an additional 30 percent of those positions, Gioia said.
There will also be an estimated 1,000 new prevailing wage construction jobs for the three years the resort is being built, Gioia said.
Lina Velasco, a senior planner with the city of Richmond who is managing the environmental impact review of the project, said that the environmental impact report on the project was released in October for public comment. The public comment period ended Oct. 23.
The city planning department is now reviewing all of the comments and will be responding to them and looking to see if further analysis of the project is needed.
The comments and responses will become a part of the final environmental impact report, which will then go before the Richmond City Council for approval, Velasco said.
The city's goal is to complete responses to public comments sometime in December.
Velasco said there appeared to be an equal number of people in favor of the project as there are against it.
Richmond Mayor Gayle McLaughlin has publicly said she is opposed to the project and the City of San Pablo issued a resolution stating its opposition to the project, Velasco said.
According to the tribe, the Richmond
Chamber of Commerce
Gioia said that Contra Costa County Sheriff Warren Rupf has also written a letter saying he is in favor of the project.
Barring any major setbacks, the local and federal approval process could be completed in 2010 and the developer could break ground next fall, Velasco said.
The Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians is a federally recognized tribe that is seeking to develop a land base to support tribal government functions. They hope that the casino resort will give them a way to provide health care, education, eldercare, economic development and other services to their people.
According to the tribe's Web site, the tribe lost its land in 1851 through an unfulfilled treaty with the U.S. government. The tribe's federal recognition was restored in 1991 following a settlement in federal court. The tribe is believed to have historical ties to Point Molate, Velasco said. Copyright 2009 by KTVU.com and Bay City News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Barnidge: No simple answer on how to bet on casino's meaning for Richmond and Contra Costa
By Tom Barnidge Posted: 11/06/2009 07:57:10 PM PST Updated: 11/07/2009 04:34:47 PM PST
THE PEOPLE who addressed the Contra Costa County supervisors Tuesday came armed with hard-edge opinions on building an Indian casino-resort on the Richmond waterfront. One unemployed man said the Point Molate project proposed by the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians was a godsend for job seekers trying to support families. "When there's no work, there's no medical coverage," he said. "When there's no work, there's no dental." How could anyone argue with that? Then a woman stepped to the microphone and spoke of the lives ruined by gambling addiction. She said that more than a million people in California have a gambling problem, and another casino will create more of them. How could anyone argue with that? The speakers, each limited to three minutes, continued in this fashion for nearly three hours. Those in favor of the project outnumbered opponents, but that wasn't as striking as each advocate's absolute certainty in his or her position. One man said job opportunities would take teens off the street, give a purpose to their lives and curtail crime. Another was equally certain that a casino would attract miscreants, prey on the poor and pave the way for more gambling dens. Sides were drawn and positions taken. You loved the idea or you hated it, simple as that. Except nothing is simple about this project, and that includes whether it ever happens. Richmond has said OK, but only the U.S. Department of the Interior can declare 266 acres of the former Point Molate Naval Fuel Depot an Indian reservation eligible for casino development. The county is only an advisory agency, whose endorsement is important but unnecessary. Still, that decision weighs heavily, with strong arguments for and against. Richmond, battered by the economy and high unemployment, desperately needs a boost. Gambling, which keeps company with the deadly sins, attracts dollars the way dogs attract fleas. The question is whether the payoff is worth the risk. Supervisor John Gioia, in whose district the project would be built, long opposed urban gaming before recently reversing himself. A fair guess is that he saw the handwriting on the wall and tried to make the most of a difficult situation. In exchange for the county's blessing, the tribe would pay it $12 million a year — $7 million for environmental protection and restoration and for safety needs and $5 million in community benefits. The pact would clear the path for Las Vegas-style slots for the first time in county history. Gioia, a longtime West County resident, said he would prefer an economic development tied to something other than a casino, but the upside is impossible to ignore — an estimated 1,000 construction jobs, beginning in 2011, and 4,500 casino jobs starting in 2014. Labor unions have made no secret of where they stand. "If you layer the additional revenue for county services and programs in West County on top of the jobs and economic development, this project could turn into a net benefit for the region," Gioia said, sounding as if he still was trying to persuade himself. No sense asking his constituents. They've come down squarely on both sides of the issue. "I've been accused by some of flip-flopping," he said. "Others say I've evolved and are glad I've reassessed my position." No mixed emotions for Andres Soto, founder of the Coalition to Save Point Molate. "I think gaming is a regressive tax on poor and working-class people," he said, "and to put it in the face of people in West County will be highly destructive. It's a very bad development strategy for a community. "The construction jobs are great. My problem with that is once everything's built, we're going to be stuck with a casino." And 4,500 jobs. Don't forget that. The undercurrent is what might follow. Will Casino San Pablo, which is licensed for electronic bingo machines, lobby for real slots? Will the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians, pushing for a casino along the Richmond Parkway, add yet another Vegas-like lure? Will Richmond wake up one morning as the Atlantic City of the West? Would that be bad or good? The only absolutely certain people were those speaking at Tuesday's meeting. Reach Tom Barnidge at tbarnidge@bayareanewsgroup.com City offering businesses a free pass on late fees County unanimous in support for casino Local casino opposition crumbling
Developer Jim Levine stands just north of Point Molate. He hopes to build a casino resort and residential neighborhood on the land in the background. Photo by Alex L. Weber. November 11, 2009 – 6:00 am Filed Under: Changing City, Front, Uncategorized Opposition to a Las Vegas-style casino resort in Richmond is collapsing as casino backers hand over promises for millions of dollars, thousands of jobs and major environmental concessions. A formerly divided Richmond City Council has softened its stance. Residents and officials are clamoring for employment, and the county Board of Supervisors Tuesday reversed its initial opposition to the project in exchange for a $12 million annual cut of casino profits. “The project is dynamic,” developer Jim Levine said. “It’ll be one of the major destinations of any kind—tribal or not—in California.” The controversial casino project would grant a California tribe federal trust land to build what’s known as a Type III casino—one with blackjack, slots and other games that pit the gambler against the house. This would be the first time in the state’s history that a tribe would be given urban land for such a venture. Some opponents say the project could change the landscape of the East Bay into the urban gaming capital of the country. “A casino in Richmond,” Mayor Gayle McLaughlin said, “is outrageous.” McLaughlin is one of the few vocal opponents still standing. In September, Senator Dianne Feinstein and four other senators sent a letter to the Secretary of the Interior stating their strong opposition to taking off-reservation lands into trust for gaming purposes. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has issued a proclamation against urban Indian casinos and recently filed a letter of opposition with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the City of Richmond. And a local group called the Coalition to Save Point Molate is also still fighting the project. The decision ultimately rests with the Interior Secretary, who will take into consideration local sentiment. In the face of diminishing resistance, the dominoes are falling fast toward construction of what would be one of the biggest urban casino resorts in California—right on the Richmond shore. Empty land on the waterfront Point Molate, with its grassy hills, prime bayshore property and sparkling views of the San Francisco skyline, fell into the hands of the City of Richmond in 2003. That year, the city bought 85 percent of the old fuel depot from the Navy for $1 under the Base Realignment and Closure Act. One of the stipulations of the deal was that the area had to be developed in a self-sustaining and economically viable way.
A collapsing sign welcomes motorists along Western Drive to the old Naval fuel depot and former Village of Point Molate. Photo by Alex L. Weber. In 2004, the city entered into a land disposition agreement—a terms-of-sale document vaguely resembling a lease—with a development firm called Upstream Point Molate, LLC. Upstream management partner and developer Jim Levine represents the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians. The 112-member tribe currently owns 44 acres near Ukiah, and they are petitioning the federal government to take Point Molate into trust as reservation land. The petition appears to rest on whether their proposal has the support of the community and if they can prove an historical tie to the area. While the tribe awaits a ruling from the Secretary of the Interior, Levine has been working hard to secure the property for development. He’s paid the City of Richmond $15 million toward the final purchase price of $50 million. Levine owes another $5 million in January, said Janet Schneider, administrative chief at the Richmond city manager’s office. That’s a total of $20 million in nonrefundable deposits—money Levine won’t get back if the project doesn’t move forward. A promissory note will permit Levine to pay the remaining $30 million over a 15-year period if the City Council clears the way for the casino. In March 2005, the city and the Bureau of Indian Affairs embarked on a joint environmental impact review of Point Molate. The draft Environmental Impact Review (EIR) was released in July and presents six alternatives for the use of the land, ranging from a casino resort to total parkland. Alternative B is the Guidiville project. It includes not just a casino but also an entertainment complex about the size of a football field, two hotels, a retail village and more than 300 residential homes—about one-third for the tribe and two-thirds to be sold on the open market, according to Levine. The EIR also guarantees the city $20 million each year. Part of that money is a service fee for police, fire protection and road maintenance the city will provide at the resort. Before any project can move forward, the Richmond City Council must now decide whether to certify the EIR. “What we’ve been told is that the [Department of the] Interior will view certification of the EIR as indication of local support for the transfer,” Janet Schneider said. “The assumption now is that [the City Council] will certify the EIR.” What once looked like a significant hurdle now seems to be a simple hop. At least two council members who were once anti-gaming are looking favorably at Upstream’s plans. The environmental payoff City Council members Maria Viramontes and Jeff Ritterman were initially skeptical of the project and wary of urban gambling. Both are focused on environmental concerns, they said. Viramontes said she still isn’t a proponent of casinos in her city, but she likes the project’s guarantees for open space, trail access and conservation, and she said she’s committed to follow through on the city’s promise to the Navy to develop the area in an economically viable way. “I’m not comfortable with urban gambling as a California state policy,” Viramontes said, “but you have to judge a proposal on its merit or its lack of merit. It sounds like an interesting and lovely project.” Ritterman concurred. “I’m not a big fan of urban gaming, so there’s a major downside to that,” he said. “But a lot of my support hinges o environmental concerns, so if the environmental payoff is considerably large, I’ll look past the gaming aspect.” n
A rendering of "Alternative B," which calls for a "mixed-use tribal destination casino resort with residential component," according to the EIR. Graphic provided by Jim Levine. Ritterman said he’s been in close contact with conservation groups about what would constitute a large environmental payoff, and he’s waiting on the outcome of a lawsuit filed against Upstream by the Citizens for East Shore Parks. Ritterman said he anticipates a “pretty good settlement” that includes a promise from Upstream to preserve Richmond’s entire northern shoreline. Levine said shoreline accessibility is important. “We’ve identified opportunities to achieve some magnificent open-space goals with Citizens for East Shore Parks,” Levine said, “and we’re exploring how to finalize that.” Representatives from Citizens for East Shore Parks would not comment on the tentative agreement. The toxic cleanup When the Navy’s fuel depot shut down, Point Molate housed twenty 50,000-gallon tanks of bulk fuel. According to the EIR, those containers have already been cleaned out and the fuel hauled away. Part of the city’s land disposition agreement with Upstream is that the company must dig up the old tanks and get them to a landfill before construction can begin. Levine estimates that process will cost $32 million. The majority of that—$28.5 million—will come from the Navy, according to Janet Schneider. She said that money is due to transfer to the city “any day now.” Then the city will send the funds to Upstream for the environmental remediation. Levine said he and the tribe will contribute the rest of the money. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board is overseeing the process. Board spokeswoman Sandy Potter confirmed that inspectors will schedule the cleanup and test groundwater quality. The jobs Richmond councilman Nathaniel Bates has backed the project from the beginning because Levine and the tribe are promising about 17,000 new jobs. “It’s a financial goldmine for Richmond,” he said, pointing to the stipulation in the EIR that the Guidiville Band hire city residents for at least 40 percent of its “operational” positions. The available jobs may not call for highly skilled applicants, but that’s a plus, Bates said. “Hotel staffing, cooks, cashiers, janitors—all carry with them a living-wage salary that people can afford to live comfortably on,” Bates said. He said the city has set the living wage salary at $14 to $15 per hour. “We’re signed up to comply with the city’s living wage requirements,” Levine said, as stipulated in the EIR, “but our average wage will well exceed that.” If Levine hadn’t signed that agreement, the tribe—as a sovereign nation not subject to city mandates—wouldn’t have had to meet the living wage requirements. Outspoken casino opponent McLaughlin called the employment projections a “pipe dream” and criticized the jobs as low-quality and low-paying. “A casino economy has never helped us,” she said. Levine dismissed her criticism. “The mayor was against the project before she saw any projections, and she’ll keep coming up with reasons as to why she’s against it,” he said. “I don’t know if she even has the capacity to understand the projections.” The opposition A dwindling faction of opponents continues to publicly battle Upstream and the tribe. Strident resistance comes from McLaughlin, who raises concerns that the ripple effects of gambling could include addiction, substance abuse, crime, bankruptcy and domestic violence.
Andrés Soto of the Coalition to Save Point Molate speaks at a Richmond planning commission meeting in September. Photo by Phoebe Fronista. In September, the Contra Costa County Administrator’s Office commissioned the Abaris Group in Walnut Creek to review existing studies on the impact of casinos. The review cites research into Casino San Pablo by the East Bay Coalition Against Urban Casinos. That study found that after the casino added 548 slot machines in 2006, burglary and general disturbance calls on the grounds and in surrounding neighborhoods tripled, and rates of vehicle theft nearly quadrupled. The Abaris review also states that the negative effects on Richmond’s public health “would be significant, particularly in terms of tobacco use and asthma” in a community “already burdened with severe environmental hazards.” Levine disputes the health and safety concerns. “The ills associated with problem gambling are the same as the ones associated with unemployment,” he said. Also standing in opposition to the casino is a front of environmental groups, church leaders and others collectively called the Coalition to Save Point Molate—many of whose public relations consultants and interns are financed by rival card clubs in Emeryville, the South Bay and the Peninsula, according to Coalition spokesman Andrés Soto. Soto accuses local officials of caving before the prospect of Levine’s millions of dollars. “[Levine] is trying to pick off the opposition using the appeal of money,” he said, and local government is “willing to sell out the community for a pittance.” Soto and McLaughlin are both skeptical of the plans for traffic management and the projections for visitors to the casino resort, many shipping in on the Vallejo ferry. “The idea of thousands of people coming to Point Molate by ferry is ridiculous,” McLaughlin said. “People don’t come to vacation in San Francisco to go to the gambling casino.” Levine counters that he’s also in talks with AC Transit and BART to help shuttle visitors. The final say In some measure, the fate of the Guidiville casino resort rests in the City Council’s hands. Certification of the EIR is tantamount to the city’s blessing for the project. And, according to City of Richmond senior planner Lina Velasco, certification must be based only on whether the review meets guidelines set by the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council could make what’s known as a statement of overriding considerations if members find there are “unavoidable significant impacts” to the environment, Velasco said. Even then, city staffers would be directed to make the necessary changes in order for the EIR to move forward. If it does, there will be one less obstacle between the 112 members of the Guidiville Band and a new reservation on Richmond’s shoreline—a reservation that will bring cash, jobs and an urban casino of unprecedented size and scope. Tomorrow: A look into how a tribe acquires trust land for an urban casino. Filed Under: Changing City, Front, Uncategorized This entry was written by , posted on at 6:00 am, filed under Changing City, Front, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. City offering businesses a free pass on late fees County unanimous in support for casino 3 Trackbacks
[...] Rafael Bridge moved forward Tuesday night when the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors reversed its initial opposition to the project of the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians in exchange for annual cut of casino [...]
[...] Photo & Video « Local casino opposition crumbling [...]
[...] of the proposed Point Molate casino warn that approving the project could transform the East Bay into Las Vegas. Both the governor and [...] |
