Following is
an article in today’s San Francisco Chronicle about the effort to secure
a route for the Bay Trail to Point Molate.
Click here
for a summary
of the legal arguments made to the California State Lands Commission.
Councilmember Jim Rogers and other East Bay leaders met with Lt.
Governor Garamendi, who is one of the three State Lands Commissioners,
to urge him to support the Bay Trail in the negotiations with Chevron
over renewal of the Long Wharf lease.
RICHMOND
Dustup over missing link of Bay Trail
Chevron refuses access over its refinery land, citing
security risk
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/02/BAG04OVSEF1.DTL
Chuck Squatriglia, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, April 2, 2007
Richmond officials want the state to end Chevron's lease on a wharf
that extends 3,440 feet from Point Richmond into the bay unless the
refinery makes room for the San Francisco Bay Trail.
The latest push to close a three-quarter-mile gap in the trail at the
east end of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge draws the State Lands
Commission into a dispute that began in 2001.
Trail advocates want Chevron to let the path traverse its refinery,
finally linking Point Richmond and Point Molate. The company has
refused, citing security reasons.
Frustrated, the City Council has unanimously urged the State Lands
Commission to intervene.
A renewal of Chevron's lease on the subtidal land beneath Long Wharf,
which carries 10 million gallons of crude oil into the refinery each
day, is pending before the commission. The city wants the lease to
require that Chevron accommodate the Bay Trail and pay for its
construction.
If that doesn't work, one City Council member said he will suggest
that the city seize the land.
"Taking the land by eminent domain is a next step that I would be
willing to look at," said Councilman Tom Butt. He said he also would
lobby state Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, to introduce
legislation creating a right-of-way for the trail. "It could get a whole
lot worse for Chevron."
Chevron insists that it is eager to help close the gap in the trail
and said using land that Caltrans owns north of Interstate 580 is a
better option.
"We support the community's effort," said spokeswoman Camille
Priselac. "That's why we want to work to improve the existing access on
the north side of the highway."
More than 260 miles of trail have been laid since 1987 when the
Legislature authorized the creation of a 400-mile trail circling San
Francisco and San Pablo bays. The trail already meanders 24 miles
through Richmond; an additional 17 miles are in the works.
Advocates argue that a trail through Chevron's refinery is the only
way to link Point Richmond and Point Molate, which are separated by
I-580 and the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.
A bike path allows cyclists to ride from Castro Street to Western
Drive on the south side of I-580 but requires riding on the highway. A
cyclist was killed and another seriously injured when a motorist hit
them in September.
The Bay Trail ends at Tewksbury Avenue in Point Richmond and picks up
again just south of the bridge toll plaza. Closing the 4,000-foot gap
has long been a goal of the city, Contra Costa County, the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission and other agencies, groups and individuals.
"It's a very high priority," said Laura Thompson, Bay Trail project
manager. "We've been trying to find a solution to it since (2001)."
That's when an engineering firm retained by the city and Chevron ruled
that the best way to close the gap was to build along the south side of
I-580.
Trail advocates felt they'd reached a consensus among the city, the
refinery, the East Bay Regional Park District and other parties -- a
point reflected in an addendum to the engineering firm's report on the
matter. The report states Chevron's security concerns could be addressed
easily.
But Chevron insists there was no agreement on how to proceed, and the
report notes the refinery's call to explore other options.
Chevron officials say the engineering firm's analysis was done before
9/11 and the company can no longer endorse a trail that would pass
within 50 feet of pipelines and pumping stations. The Bay Trail crosses
portions of two other East Bay refineries, ConocoPhilips in Rodeo and
Shell in Martinez. Chevron's Priselac said the trail was built along
existing roadways in those cases, minimizing the threat to security.
"The security issue (raised by Chevron) doesn't make any sense," said
Bruce Beyaert, chairman of the Trails for Richmond Action Committee.
Beyaert, a Chevron employee for 33 years until retiring in 1992, and
others believe a fenced trail would improve security. It would be closed
at sundown, and Chevron could install video cameras.
With no compromise on the horizon, the Richmond City Council joined a
growing number of East Bay politicians, governmental agencies, bicycling
advocates and others calling on the Lands Commission to intervene. Since
1947, Chevron has leased from the state 68 acres of subtidal land
beneath Long Wharf. A 30-year lease renewal is pending, although the
state commission has not set a date for considering the matter.
Trail advocates want the lease to require Chevron to set aside land
for the trail and finance its construction.
But Mark Meier, general counsel for the commission, said the agency
has no authority to impose such a requirement. The wharf is not an
impediment to construction of the trail, he said, so the state cannot
require Chevron to accommodate it.
Richmond officials disagree.
"We're talking about a business deal between the state and Chevron,
and in a business deal, anything's open for negotiation," said Butt, who
introduced the resolution the council approved on March 20. "To hear
them say it's none of their business just doesn't wash."
Online resources
For more information about the Bay Trail, its path in Richmond, the
city's resolution to the State Lands Commission, and the commission, go
to:
links.sfgate.com/ZBB
links.sfgate.com/ZBC
links.sfgate.com/ZBD
links.sfgate.com/ZBE
E-mail Chuck Squatriglia at
csquatriglia@sfchronicle.com. |