-
|
-
|
E-Mail Forum | |||||||
RETURN | |||||||
West County Times Says Throw
the Bums Out October 15, 2004 |
|||||||
The West County Times posted its City Council endorsements today, recommending a clean sweep of incumbents and filling the five vacant positions with newcomers. This is the second time in a row the Times has skipped over me. In the 2001 mayoral election, the Times endorsed Anderson, but I still ran second in a field of four sitting City Council members. Being one of the recommended “sweepees,” I cannot help but comment at least in my own defense. The editorial notes, “The most troubling aspect of all of this is that the leadership of the city seems unwilling to investigate exactly what happened.” As far as I know, I am the only City Council member who has both privately and publicly gone on record as requesting a Grand Jury investigation of Richmond’s financial debacle. The entire City Council, as I recall, supported a State audit, which will soon be reported. I am also one of a very few Council members who has continually complained about the quantity and quality of information made available to the City Council over the past few years, including a budget that is virtually indecipherable. It was Mindell Penn and I who first brought to light the shortcomings of the City’s SAP system in the face of vehement staff denial. It is a little known fact that three of the four incumbents now running did not support the selection of the city manager on whose watch the financial crises occurred. The Charter does not give the City Council authority over the selection of department heads, so the lack of permanent managers cannot be laid on the City Council. I was, however, personally involved in recruiting the current interim city manager, whose selection the Times has praised. In reciting the qualifications of the endorsees, the Times cited only their education and employment experience but nothing about how they propose to balance a budget that is still tens of millions out of whack. Not a single detail. That’s because no challenger has provided a plan. What the City Council needs are critical thinkers and problem solvers with the backbone to reverse an embedded culture that has relegated the operation of Richmond to a staff riddled with incompetence. Some of the endorsees have shown a tendency for scrapping, such as Soto and Booze. Whether the others are up to the equivalent of a parliamentary street fight to reverse the course of a municipal leviathan remains to be seen. The last thing we need right now are nice guys. Neither did the Times comment on the political position of their endorsees on perennial hot button issues in Richmond, such as land use, street sweeping, fences, privatization of city services, the environment, use of the shoreline, planning, development and industrial safety. There was not one projection of what any of them would do about Point Molate or ongoing contract negotiations with five public employee unions on which tens of millions of dollars will depend. Unlike previous elections, the Times did not interview the candidates. Only answers to written questionnaires were requested. The Times, of course, is entitled to their opinion, and we to ours. The voters will decide. Other endorsements of various organizations and individuals, to the best of my knowledge, are listed following the Times editorial below.
|
|||||||
RETURN |